Skip to main content

Israel: The world’s number one ‘master of disaster’

Doctoring WHO's emergency medical relief award system can't hide Israel’s record of creating unnatural catastrophes

In recent days Israeli media has been aflutter with reports that their country has received an unprecedented distinction from the World Health Organisation (WHO), the public health arm of the United Nations. Apparently, this confirms Israel’s position as superstar among nations.

On 13 November, the Times of Israel blared the headline: “UN ranks IDF emergency medical team as ‘No. 1 in the world’”. The Ynetnews website followed suit with “WHO: Israel’s field hospital best in world”, while the Jewish Telegraphic Agency opted for “Israeli army medics named world’s best in disaster relief.”

As it turns out, the source of the 'ranking' rumour appears to be none other than the Israeli military itself 

The website of Israel’s i24news television channel announced: “Israeli field hospital ranked best in the world by WHO.”

Purged of fanfare, the essence of the story is this: Back in 2013, the WHO developed a classification system for foreign medical teams responding to sudden onset disasters (earthquakes, for example), in order to help ensure preparedness and quality of services as well as facilitate better organised deployment of personnel and equipment in accordance with the situation at hand.

Under the new system, medical teams are divided into three categories: Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3, with the final category indicating the most extensive capabilities. Now, as international teams undertake the qualification process, the Israeli army’s emergency response team has been the first to attain Type 3 status.

I emailed the media relations folks at WHO headquarters in Geneva. The response: 'WHO does not rank emergency medical teams'

Curious about the exact width of the gap between reality and Israeli media sensationalism, I emailed the media relations folks at WHO headquarters in Geneva. The response:

“WHO does not rank emergency medical teams, as far as which is considered number 1 or number 2 in the world. For type 3 emergency medical team classification, the Israel team was the first team to be classified in that category. More emergency medical teams may be certified Type 3 in the future.”

So much for being “number one”.

Indeed, a recent WHO news item notes that “[a]t the moment 75 [emergency medical teams] from 32 countries are working towards meeting minimum standards required by WHO. That number is expected to increase to as many as 200 teams.”

As it turns out, the source of the “ranking” rumour appears to be none other than the Israeli military itself - judging from coverage in various publications including The Jerusalem Post, which reported that “Israel’s emergency medical response team has been recognised by the United Nations as the ‘No. 1 in the world’ and classified as its first Type 3 field hospital, the IDF announced on Sunday”.

'No friend of Israel'

Meanwhile, several articles have made a point of arguing that one reason the WHO designation is such big news is that the UN is no friend to Israel - a perception sustained by the tired Zionist myth of Israel’s singular persecution at the hands of the cruel intergovernmental organisation.

The list of Israeli offences goes on - hence the utility of a whitewashed image of Israel as emergency responder r

Falling right into line, the New York Post marvels at the “unexpectedly good news for Israel coming out of the United Nations”. But the UN has never really meant bad news for Israel, which continues to quite literally get away with murder - including of Lebanese and Palestinian civilians sheltering in UN installations, in addition to UN staff themselves.

From an objective standpoint, the fact that the Israeli military has slaughtered tens of thousands of people over recent decades - not to mention repeatedly bombed hospitals and other medical venues - should categorically disqualify the country from any sort of accolade in the health care arena.

The Times of Israel quotes the WHO’s Dr Ian Norton on the importance of promoting medical teams that “behave ethically in the field”. But it’s not exactly ethical for the Israelis to assist victims of natural disaster in Haiti, Nepal and beyond while consciously inflicting unnatural disaster on other areas.

Disaster makers

Incidentally, the author of the Times of Israel article in question penned a previous article in October about the impending possibility of a Type 3 WHO designation - this one with the unintentionally spot-on headline “Masters of disaster.”

Among the more recent disasters spearheaded by Israel, Operation Protective Edge killed some 2,251 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip over a period of 50 days in 2014. According to the United Nations, this figure included 299 women and 551 children.

At the end of the day, death just isn’t good for one’s health.

Beyond devastating bombing campaigns and other run-of-the-mill forms of mass military murder, meanwhile, Israel’s masterful repertoire has also included smaller-scale manoeuvres highly hazardous to the health of select populations.

To pick but a couple of examples out of a surplus, the tradition of detaining pregnant Palestinian women at Israeli army checkpoints is hardly an ethical response to an emergency situation - particularly when mother and/or baby perishes. Ditto for shooting pregnant Palestinians at checkpoints. At the end of the day, death just isn’t good for one’s health.

Nor is being maimed - or worse - by Israeli cluster bombs in Lebanon, being condemned to eternal PTSD in the Gaza Strip, or being fatally bulldozed while trying to prevent the destruction of Palestinian homes.

The list of Israeli offences goes on - hence the utility of a whitewashed image of Israel as emergency responder rather than cause of emergencies. And while it should be tougher to whitewash ethnic cleansing, the fact that it’s not is an emergency in itself.

Belen Fernandez is the author of The Imperial Messenger: Thomas Friedman at Work, published by Verso. She is a contributing editor at Jacobin magazine.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Photo: A medical team treats a Lebanese civilian after being wounded in an Israeli air raid that targeted the Rmeyleh bridge in Saida 17 July 2006. (AFP)

This article is available in French on Middle East Eye French edition.

New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch

Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters

Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.