Israel's left badly needs a populist leader if it ever wants power again
Populist politicians have dominated the global political landscape during the past decade, among them Donald Trump in the United States, Vladimir Putin in Russia, Viktor Orban in Hungary, Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkey and Narendra Modi in India
Israel presents something of an anomaly in what appears to be an era of charismatic demagogues. It does not have just one populist politician. It has many.
Labor hasn't had a populist leader for quite some time and it is one of the reasons why the party lost every election since Ehud Barak’s narrow victory against Netanyahu in 1999
Australian academic Benjamin Moffitt has written of populism as being akin to a political style, repertoire or even performance. Indeed, one could go further and add that the populist politician is like an actor who delivers pantomime-like, crowd-pleasing lines to the emotions of the public, be they through social media, TV or print.
The populist leader simplifies politics and policy into what can best be defined as "us" and "them", appealing to "the people" against outsiders. In Israel, these “others” may be the country's Arab citizens, a traditional elite deemed out of touch with the ordinary citizen, or even nefarious forces such as human rights groups, NGOs, prosecutors, the supreme court or left-leaning politicians.
Last month, while addressing thousands of cheering supporters at a rally, Netanyahu used typically populist rhetoric to brush aside investigations alleging corruption as a conspiracy between the media and the Israeli left.
Once the party of Golda Meir
But that’s just the prime minister. Israel has plenty of other populist politicians, for example:
- The wiley Avigdor Lieberman, who currently serves as defence minister and is leader of the right-wing nationalist Beiteinu (Israel Our Home) party
- Yair Lapid of the centrist Yesh Atid, who left his career as a popular television host to enter politics
- Naftali Bennett, Israel’s minister of education and leader of the Jewish Home Party, a reformation of the National Religious Party
- Ayelet Shaked, Bennett's sidekick and one of the ringleaders of attempts to curtail the freedom of Israel’s Supreme Court for being too powerful and unrepresentative of Israeli society. She has also advocated legislation to prioritise Israel’s Jewish identity over democracy
Back in the day when the Labor Party won elections, it was led by charismatic leaders such as David Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir and Yitzhak Rabin. Not anymore.
Labor doesn’t have a populist leader - nor hasn't had one - for quite some time and it is one of the reasons why the party lost every election since Ehud Barak’s narrow victory against Netanyahu in 1999.
It seems that the party prefers technocratic politicians who have the unique ability to deliver dull and lacklustre speeches over politicians who can excite the electorate and stand a chance of winning.
To make matters worse, Labor’s recent leadership contest showed that it still has not caught up with the political zeitgeist.
The party recently elected a new leader. The winner was self-made millionaire Avi Gabbay, who won the final run-off against former party leader Amir Peretz with 52 per cent of the 30,000 votes cast by Labor members from a turnout of just under 58 percent.
A former minister of environmental protection, Gabbay only entered the Knesset in 2015 as a founding member of the centrist Kulanu Party, which he then quit to join Labor.
The problem with technocrats
The moment for a Labor revival ought to be promising. There is a very real possibility that Netanyahu will be indicted on serious corruption charges: it would appear that it is only a matter of time before Israel’s longest-serving prime minister leaves office.
This is perhaps the best opportunity for Israel’s left’s to finally win an election and end almost two decades in opposition. But while initial polls predict that if elections were held today with Gabbay at the helm, then Labor, under the Zionist Union alliance, might win 20-24 seats, still amounting to a defeat. The ruling Likud is still expected to win any future election, which has to take place by November 2019 at the very latest.
Gabbay is yet another introspective and technocratic Labor leader without the charisma and wherewithal to combat Netanyahu or Israel’s other populist politicians
Gabbay is yet another introspective and technocratic Labor leader without the charisma and wherewithal to combat Netanyahu or Israel’s other populist politicians.
The left’s position in support of a two-state solution sounds increasingly dreary against naysayers who use popular rhetoric to gain media attention and delegitimise liberal policies. The contrast with countries like the UK and US, where Jeremy Corbyn and Bernie Sanders have respectively rejuvenated the left, is unmistakable.
Israel’s left needs a leader who can excite and talk to ordinary people in a manner which is simple and arousing: in other words, a populist.
Until then, Israel’s left will continue to wane and continue to lose more elections.
Simon A Waldman is a Mercator-IPC fellow at the Istanbul Policy Center and a visiting research fellow at King’s College London.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Photo: Avi Gabbay after being voted in as the new leader of Israel's Labor Party on 10 July 2017 in Tel Aviv (AFP)
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.
