Trump's 'deal of the century': A blessing in disguise?
Born and raised in Beersheba, the largest city in the Negev desert of southern Palestine, she, together with her parents and siblings, was dispossessed in 1948 and forced to flee to the city of Hebron, where my father was born and raised.
For her, and for the millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants, their country was conquered, their land was usurped and their lives were destroyed by invaders, some of whom were fleeing genocide and persecution in Europe.
The right of return
The issue for my mother and her fellow Palestinians was, and still is, not the creation of a Palestinian state whose size, shape and borderlines are determined by their oppressors but the right to return to their homeland.
The one thing that Trump’s deal does not mention, the one thing that might have meant something for the Palestinians, is their right of return
The one thing that Trump’s deal does not mention, the one thing that might have meant something for the Palestinians, is their right of return.
The rest of the plan is nothing but the status quo created in Palestine by the descendants of the invaders with one objective, namely to deny the Palestinians their right to return to their homeland. Trump’s announcement means little more than a US official recognition of that status quo whose features are very much similar, if not identical, to those that characterised the white racist minority regime in Apartheid South Africa.
Legitimising the theft
Not only has the land usurped from the Palestinians in 1948 been lost for ever, but so as well has a significant proportion of the land occupied in 1967, where colonial settlements for the exclusive benefit of Jewish settlers have been erected and are expanding.
Through his plan, Trump is really doing nothing apart from taking credit for recognising as legitimate the additional theft perpetrated by the Zionists over the years since 1967. Despite longstanding, almost unconditional US support for Israel, no US president before Trump contemplated going that far.
Trump is really doing nothing apart from taking credit for recognising as legitimate the additional theft perpetrated by the Zionists over the years since 1967
However, the Israelis continued, and more so since the assassination of former prime minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995, to create new realities on the ground such as land confiscations and house demolitions, building new settlements or expanding existing ones, the annexation of Jerusalem and the Golan Heights and building a segregation wall.
Done deal: How the peace process sold out the Palestinians+ Show - Hide
Middle East Eye's "Done Deal" series examines how many of the elements of US President Donald Trump's so-called "deal of the century" reflect a reality that already exists on the ground.
It looks at how Palestinian territory has already been effectively annexed, why refugees have no realistic prospect of ever returning to their homeland, how the Old City of Jerusalem is under Israeli rule, how financial threats and incentives are used to undermine Palestinian opposition to the status quo, and how Gaza is kept under a state of permanent siege.
Jerusalem's Old City: How Palestine's past is being slowly erased
Financial aid: How dependency on donors leaves Palestinians trapped
Yet, it must be admitted that such Israeli encroachments would not have become so easy had it not been for the security arrangement, or collaboration, taking place between the occupation authority and the Palestinian Authority (PA). That is why few Palestinians will take seriously the announcement by PA President Mahmoud Abbas and other officials that they object to the deal of the century.
PA's heinous crime
If the deal is in essence nothing but an officiation of the changes effected by the Israelis across the West Bank, few of those changes would have been possible had the Palestinians of the West Bank been free to resist or at least protest. The crime committed by the Palestinian security agencies, in terms of shackling the Palestinians and facilitating the arrest and detention of their activists, is as heinous as the crime committed by the Israelis themselves.
The crime committed by the Palestinian security agencies is as heinous as the crime committed by the Israelis themselves
The one and only thing that can vindicate President Abbas is simply beyond his means. He simply cannot, and would not dare, call off security collaboration with the occupiers. And nothing short of that could make the Palestinians believe him and take him seriously as he speaks against Trump’s deal.
As a result of the Oslo peace process, there are today in the West Bank thousands of Palestinians who are completely dependent on the occupation and earn their living in its service, including Mahmoud Abbas, his cabinet, his bureaucracy and his security forces. None of these people are willing to jeopardise the status they have been given and the privileges they enjoy as a result.
Abbas in particular vowed not to repeat what he considered to be his predecessor’s fatal mistake.
End security cooperation now
When late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat returned from Camp David in 2000 with no agreement with the then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, he thought he could twist Israel’s arm by igniting a second intifada (uprising). The Israelis responded by destroying his authority. Eventually, they got rid of him altogether and brought in Abbas as a more malleable replacement.
I cannot think of anything the Palestinian Authority can do to force the Israelis and their American backers to desist apart from calling off all security cooperation and declaring the Oslo process to be null and void.
Only then will the Palestinians be able to protest more effectively against house demolitions, land confiscations and all other Israeli transgressions.
The only way to make peace in the Middle East would be to dismantle the racist ideology known as Zionism upon which the very idea of a Jewish state is based
One should not take seriously the pretentious show of unity by Fatah and Hamas in protest against Trump’s deal. Such public expressions of solidarity have no real value so long as the security agencies of the former continue to serve the occupation by hunting down the activists of the latter.
Yet, I believe that Palestinians who are able to express their objection should do so, whether in Gaza, the West Bank or in the diaspora.
It is of paramount importance that their opinion is known and their voice is heard. In addition, the supporters of the Palestinian cause around the world should also make themselves heard.
In the present circumstances, nothing seems to perturb Israel and the Zionist lobby more than boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS). This movement has been instrumental in exposing the ugly face of Zionism and the hypocrisy of world powers that support it or that tolerate its offences.
Where do we go from here?
In as much as Trump’s announcement today has been a cause for jubilation by the Zionists, it can also be a blessing in disguise for the opponents of Zionism. Despite referring to a Palestine and showing it on a map, Trump told the world on Tuesday that the so-called two-state solution as envisaged by the Oslo Accords is off the table. His utter bias in favour of Israel also speaks volumes.
The United States is unqualified to act as a broker because it embraces the Zionist ideology that provides a superhuman status to Jews while relegating to a subhuman status all others, including the natives of the land.
Such an ideology is not something decent humans can tolerate or coexist with.
Where do we go from here? Well, it would seem to me that just as peace was finally reached in South Africa by dismantling the racist ideology known as apartheid, the only way to make peace in the Middle East would be to dismantle the racist ideology known as Zionism upon which the very idea of a Jewish state is based.
Once that battle is won, we would end up in a situation where human beings, irrespective of their creed or race, are of equal status and equal rights. This is what one may call the one-state solution.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
This article is available in French on Middle East Eye French edition.