US elections 2024: Bill Clinton’s Gaza comments draw outrage on social media
Former US President Bill Clinton has sparked backlash online after saying the Palestinian group Hamas “forces" Israel to kill Palestinian civilians.
Clinton addressed an audience in Michigan on Wednesday to rally support for Democratic Party candidate Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the 5 November US presidential elections, with a speech that discussed Israel's ongoing war on the Gaza Strip.
Michigan is a key battleground state where former President Donald Trump and Harris are neck and neck in the polls. Historically, the state is pivotal to winning the White House and is home to the largest Arab and Muslim community in the US.
"The hardest issue here in Michigan is the Middle East. I understand why young Palestinian and Arab Americans in Michigan think too many people have died. I get that," he said.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"But if you lived in one of those kibbutzim in Israel right next to Gaza, where the people there were the most pro-friendship with Palestine, most pro-two-state solution of any of the Israeli communities - were right next to Gaza. And Hamas butchered them."
He then said that criticism of Israel’s disproportionate response was misguided.
"That all sounds nice until you realise what would you do if it was your family and you hadn't done anything but support a homeland for the Palestinians and one day they come for you and slaughter the people in your village.
"You would say, 'Well you'll have to forgive me, I'm not keeping score that way - it isn't how many we've had to kill' - because Hamas makes sure that they're shielded by civilians, they'll force you to kill civilians if you want to defend yourself."
Bill Clinton in Michigan:
— Prem Thakker (@prem_thakker) October 31, 2024
"I understand why young Palestinian and Arab Americans in Michigan think too many people have died — I get that, but…"
"Hamas makes sure that they're shielded by civilians, they'll force you to kill civilians, if you want to defend yourself." pic.twitter.com/cYzlsmWTGo
Since Israel's war on Gaza began nearly 13 months ago after the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel, Israeli forces have killed more than 43,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 100,000 others, the majority of them civilians. More than 10,000 are missing and presumed dead under the rubble.
Israel is also facing accusations of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes before international courts.
Clinton blamed Hamas for the high Palestinian civilian death toll, adding that the group “wanted to kill Israelis and make Israel uninhabitable”.
He also said, "They (Jewish people) were there first before there was their faith," invoking names like Judea and Samaria, which Israelis often use to refer to the occupied West Bank.
'Clueless and tone deaf'
Clinton’s remarks drew intense criticism online, especially among Arab and Muslim communities, with many interpreting his statements as ahistorical, "racist, genocidal, white supremacist" and ultimately dismissive of Palestinian suffering.
The Clinton clip is one of the most horrific genocidal diatribes a U.S. leader has gone on in decades. It is so explicit in its support for the extermination of Palestinians. An asinine party filled with asinine people who put their boots on our neck & call it salvation.
— Sana Saeed (@SanaSaeed) October 31, 2024
"Clueless and tone deaf," responded journalist Ghida Fakhry. "Clinton’s comments hit all the wrong notes. He’s not addressing the genuine grief and outrage; he’s pushing a narrative proven false, showing his audience he’s not there for them but for someone else’s approval."
Numerous people pointed to what they perceive as being the Democratic Party’s double standard regarding their stance on racial injustice and violence.
“This captures the essence of the Democratic Party: a party that engages in the same racism, injustice, violence, and oppression as the Republican Party, but in a polished way,” wrote one person on X, formerly known as Twitter.
Clinton wants Arab Americans to know that the Israelis killed on oct7 were nice,peace loving but that he has no vocabulary to describe 43k innocent Palestinians massacred in Gaza since then- or the thousands killed by Israel (which colonized them btw) since 1948 https://t.co/jujsy2mPix
— Amira Howeidy (@amirahoweidy) October 31, 2024
Others expressed disbelief at the Harris campaign’s approach to Michigan voters, given the state’s large Arab and Muslim population.
Bill Clinton Just Cost Kamala ALL The Michigan Voters
— Ryan Rozbiani (@RyanRozbiani) October 31, 2024
Dont vote for these الحمير pic.twitter.com/Rrk2CeuWJ1
“It’s almost as if the Democratic establishment wants to lose this election with their tone-deaf views on Arab Americans,” one critic argued.
Journalist Mehdi Hasan questioned the decision to send Clinton to Michigan, where he appeared “to lecture Muslims on how it’s all Hamas’s fault that Israel is massacring kids”, adding, “At this point, the [Democratics] deserve to lose Michigan.”
Other critics took aim at the Democratic Party's perceived Islamophobia, pointing to recent instances involving Michigan Muslims being ostracised from the campaign. “First, Ritchie Torres antagonized voters, then a Muslim leader was removed from a rally, and now Clinton is here lecturing on how Zionism predates Islam,” one person said.
However, some voices emerged in support of Clinton’s stance. “I am not a fan of Bill Clinton, but this is based… He is right on this one,” one social media user wrote.
A pro-Israeli commentator cited Clinton’s role in the 2000 Camp David Summit, during which Clinton met with Israeli and Palestinian leaders to broker a peace deal, stating that “Clinton knows their game & agrees with Israel.”
The summit ended in deadlock, with Clinton later attributing its failure to Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat’s unwillingness to compromise.
Clinton is concluding what he started in Camp David, July 2000, where he adopted Israeli positions and blamed Palestinians for not accepting them.
— Xavier Abu Eid (@xabueid) October 31, 2024
Don’t know what he had in mind, but this isn’t going to help the Harris campaign add a single vote from Arab Americans. https://t.co/6EouBpadfJ
However, critics online called this view hypocritical, arguing that Clinton was heavily biased in favour of the Israeli perspective - both during his presidency and today. Robert Malley, a part of the Clinton administration and present at the summit, wrote a New York Times opinion article one year after the summit, dispelling the "myths" about Palestinian responsibility for the summit's failure.
One social media user referenced a conversation with Dr Saeb Erekat, a prominent Palestinian negotiator, who stated that Clinton “gave the Israelis everything they wanted, then blamed the Palestinians for the failure".
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.
