Skip to main content

ICC arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant spark celebrations online and calls for action

Decision sparked widespread reactions on social media, with some saying that 'committing genocide' should have consequences
The decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, right, and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant carries significant legal and political weight (AFP)

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant on Thursday, sparking widespread reactions on social media. 

The 124 state parties to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC, are now under an obligation to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant. 

In this case, Netanyahu and Gallant will likely restrict their travel so as not to be detained - something Russia's Vladimir Putin has done since being indicted by the ICC in March last year.

Many of the states that will be compelled to hand over Netanyahu and Gallant are allies of Israel, including the UK, France, Germany, and Hungary. 

People who have been condemning Israel’s devastating war on Gaza for the past year celebrated the decision. An outspoken critic of the war, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, Kenneth Roth, said the decision shows that “fighting by war crimes, starvation and deprivation, is not allowed”.

New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch

Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters

While some said the arrest warrants were a step in the right direction for Palestinian liberation, others said they were too late. The ICC's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, announced on 20 May that the prosecutor's office had filed an application for arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. 

The decision to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant carries significant legal and political weight, and Khan’s request was part of a war crimes investigation on the situation in Palestine, launched in 2021 by his predecessor. Though Israel is not a member of the ICC, the State of Palestine was granted membership in 2015.

Accordingly, the court can investigate Israeli individuals for crimes committed in occupied Palestine, which includes the Gaza Strip, the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Others have called for swift action from the international community to fulfil the ICC’s warrants and said there should be consequences for the constant dehumanisation of people in front of the eyes of the entire world. 

One person created a list of countries that “said they will honour and/or welcome the ICC warrants issued for Israeli officials Netanyahu and Gallant”.

Some social media users wondered what legal repercussions the arrest warrants would have for the US, Israel's biggest backer, with many people accusing the US administration of arming Israel, supporting its assault on the Gaza Strip, and vetoing Israel-related UN Security Council decisions.

An educator and activist from the US highlighted that the country continues to sell arms to Israel, even though it means breaking US laws. 

Some online have criticised the warrants for not including the complicity of the US in Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Writer and commentator Jeer Heet joked: “Singling out Israel like this is wrong”.

One person implied that the international order is hypocritical because many leaders, specifically western allies of the US and Israel, supported the ICC arrest warrants for Russian President Vladimir Putin and that the world applies double standards to Israel.

Many pointed out that the US rejected the ICC’s arrest warrant decision for Netanyahu and Gallant, even though South Africa last month filed 750 pages of evidence to the International Court of Justice, outlining evidence pertaining to Israel’s alleged violation of the 1948 Genocide Convention in its ongoing war on Gaza.

Meanwhile, right groups have said that in light of the ICC's arrest warrants, US officials could now be personally liable under international law by continuing to provide Israel with military assistance.

Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.