Skip to main content

‘Two sides of same coin’: Social media reacts to US VP candidate’s unified Israel stance

As US tackles Hurricane Helene aftermath and dock workers go on strike, vice presidential debate kicked off with question on Israel
Democratic vice presidential candidate, Tim Walz, and Republican vice presidential candidate, Senator JD Vance, shake hands after a debate at CBS Broadcast Center, on 1 October 2024 in New York City (Angela Weiss/AFP)
Democratic vice presidential candidate, Tim Walz, and Republican vice presidential candidate, Senator JD Vance, shake hands after a debate at CBS Broadcast Center, on 1 October 2024 in New York City (Angela Weiss/AFP)

On Tuesday night, just hours after Iran’s missile attack on Israel, people online reacted to the US vice presidential candidates’ unapologetic support for Israel after more than a week of its heightened attacks across the Middle East, as well as almost a year of constant bombardment in Gaza. 

Ohio Senator JD Vance and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz took to the debate stage in New York City for the first and only vice presidential debate before the November elections. 

As a surprise to many, the debate’s first question was not on domestic issues like the humanitarian crisis of Hurricane Helene – which has displaced hundreds and killed at least 162 Americans - or the dock workers' strike on the East Coast, but on the candidates’ support for Israel.

“If you are the final voice in the Situation Room, would you support or oppose a preemptive strike by Israel on Iran?” co-moderator Margaret Brennan asked. 

New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch

Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters

Many online commented on the framing of the question from the CBS moderator and felt that it was priming viewers for a potential strike on Iran. “This is how the media frames military action AS A SOLUTION,” one user posted on X.

The candidates’ responses to the question brought several reactions online. 

Vance reiterated his support for Israel and the US's responsibility to aid the state "wherever they are when they’re fighting the bad guys". Walz echoed this sentiment and stated that viewers should  “keep in mind where this started … Hamas terrorists massacred over 1,400 Israelis and took prisoners”.

Presidential candidate Jill Stein responded to this statement on X, writing: “History didn't start on October 7. Israel has already been launching 'pre-emptive strikes’ on Palestine, Iran and its other neighbors for decades, and it hasn't made anyone safer.”

Another line from Walz that received a round of online reactions was when he said “the expansion of Israel and its proxies is an absolute fundamental necessity for the US to have steady leadership there”.

Some online argued that he mistakenly said Israel instead of Iran, and meant that the expansion of Iran and its proxies make it a necessity for the US to have a foothold in Israel.

Others viewed it as either a misstatement by Walz or a Freudian slip.

A general consensus of the reactions of the candidates’ stances on Israel’s expanding attacks and war in the Middle East echoes that of the presidential candidates. “Republicans and Democrats are two sides of the same coin when it comes to supporting genocide and apartheid,” Palestinian journalist Hossam Shabat posted from Gaza. 

Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.